Skip to main content
· 12/14/2006

Perales v. State

Citations

  • 226 S.W.3d 531
  • 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 10651
  • 2006 WL 3628902

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant's initial denial of touching child followed by admission of touching but with claim that it was for legitimate purposes supports inference of sexual intent
  • defendant’s initial denial of touching child followed by admission of touching but with claim that it was for legitimate purposes supports inference of sexual intent
  • considering fact that child told defendant to stop touching her

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Tim Taft

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.