Pepsi-Cola General Bottlers, Inc. v. Woods

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff had a right of action under promissory estoppel where she quit her former employment in reliance on a promise of employment with the defendant
• finding with “no difficulty” that the plaintiff made out a promissory estoppel claim where the defendant offered the plaintiff a job, gave the plaintiff a start date, and advised her to quit her existing job
• “We have no difficulty in finding that Woods has a right of action under promissory estoppel; clearly Woods quit her former employment in reliance upon a promise of employment with Pepsi.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).