Pepper Lawson Horizon International Group, LLC v. Texas Southern University

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that claims under the UCL, FAL, and CLRA “require[] that [plaintiffs] ‘show that 12 members of the public are likely to be deceived’” (citation omitted)
• noting that a product is misleading if the front of the packaging is plausibly deceptive
• applying the typical pleading 23 standard in reviewing a Federal Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss UCL, FAL, and CLRA claims 24 resting upon an allegedly misleading statement made on product’s label
• advising litigants to “draft their questions for consumers 18 surveys with utmost care”
• affirming dismissal of UCL, FAL, and CLRA at motion to dismiss stage
• affirming dismissal of claim where product label contained the word “nature”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).