Peper v. Princeton University Board of Trustees

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that ”[p]roof of discriminatory motive is critical” in gender discrimination claims and that such motive is not automatically inferred
• noting that McDonnell Douglas is “a starting point in actions brought under the [New Jersey] Law Against Discrimination”
• writing “the standard for presenting a [p]rima facie case cannot be too great lest rampant discrimination go unchecked.”
• adopting framework formulated in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973), for litigation under Title VII
• adopting framework formulated in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed, 2d 668 (1973), for litigation under Title VII
• adopting framework formulated in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 93 S.Ct. 1817, 36 L.Ed. 2d 668 (1973), for litigation under Title VII

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).