Skip to main content
· 5/7/2002

Peoples v. Michigan Department of Corrections

Citations

  • 34 F. App'x 209

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that where a plaintiff named a nondiverse defendant in its initial complaint in state court, the jurisdictional inquiry is “more stringent and more favorable toward remand”
  • declining to remand suit where violation § of 1446(d) was de minimis and later cured
  • declining to remand suit where violation § of 1446(d) was de minimis and later cured
  • collecting cases where courts concluded that a defendant’s failure to attach state-court papers to a notice of removal was a de minimis violation and did not compel remand

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.