Peoples Trust & Savings Bank v. Baird

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• limiting fee award to correspond “to the two overdue installment payments of which Bairds had received written notice before suit was commenced”
• limiting fee award to correspond “to the two overdue installment payments of which Bairds had received written notice before suit was commenced”
• rule 179(b) motion is available when it asks the court to reconsider an issue of law pertaining to a fact question presented at a hearing
• “motion for rehearing,” while not expressly recognized by our rules, will be considered as a rule 179(b) motion
• motion for rehearing was in essence motion for enlargement or amended findings
• “The bank’s failure to give adequate statutory notice was not an affirmative defense because the bank was required, as part of its claim for attorney fees, to prove that adequate notice was given.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).