Peoples Nat'l Bank v. Commissioner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding police did not violate privacy rights of drivers by accessing Department of Licensing records, in part because such records are created and maintained for law enforcement purposes
• finding no privacy interest in department of licensing records because they do not “reveal intimate details of the defendants’ lives, their activities, or the identity of their friends or political and business associates”
• “Considering the purpose for which these [DOL] records are created, citizens of this state are not entitled to expect that their information is private and protected from disclosure for law enforcement purposes.”
• \A majority of the justices in Maxfield held there is no protected privacy interest in power records.\
• “It is now well settled that the protections guaranteed by article I, section 7 of the state constitution are qualitatively different from those provided by the Fourth Amendment. . . .”
• citizens are not entitled to expect Department of Licensing (DOL) records are private and protected from disclosure because the records are gathered by a government agency for law enforcement purposes, and several Washington statutes attest to this fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).