People's Gas Light & Coke Co. v. Stuckart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding there were no grounds for challenging in a termination proceeding the alleged failure to comply with the ADA in the provision of services because services are not required by the termination statute
• “any alleged noncompliance with the ADA ... [is] a matter separate and distinct from the operation of [a termination proceeding]”
• \any alleged noncompliance with the ADA . . . [is] a matter separate and distinct from the operation of [a termination proceeding]\
• “any alleged noncompliance with the ADA. . . [is] a matter separate and distinct from the operation of our [parental] termination statute”
• “under Indiana law, even a complete failure to provide services cannot serve as a basis to attack the termination of parental rights.”
• “under Indiana law, even a complete failure to provide services cannot serve as a basis to attack the termination of parental rights.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).