Peoples Bank of South Carolina, Inc. v. Robinson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the erroneous return of a promissory note and security agreement marked “Paid and Satisfied” did not “constitute a discharge under [the UCC]”
• debt not discharged when, due to bank’s clerical error, promissory note and security agreement were marked “Paid and Satisfied” and were returned to borrowers
• cancellation of note made unintentionally, under a mistake, or without authority is inoperative and will not effect a discharge

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).