Illinois Supreme Court· 4/21/2011

People v. Ziobro

Citations

949 N.E.2d 631
242 Ill. 2d 34
350 Ill. Dec. 839
2011 Ill. LEXIS 766

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

where, after reversing the trial court’s dismissal of the criminal charges, we instructed that a new procedural statute would apply retroactively to the proceedings on remand
if the new rule were to guarantee the dismissal of the State’s action, it would affect a vested right and therefore could not be applied retroactively
if the new rule were to guarantee the dismissal of the State's action, it would affect a vested right and therefore could not be applied retroactively
“Once a violation [of a timing requirement] has been established, the court must determine the consequence of such violation.”
defendant must show he was prejudiced to be entitled to relief for a violation of a directory rule
where the police failed to comply with a court rule concerning time limits to schedule first appearances in traffic offense cases, the trial court abused its discretion by dismissing the charges without a showing of impracticability, and the rule was directory, not mandatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garman, Freeman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named People v. Ziobro

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.