People v. Zhuk

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• implicating a Crim. P. 37.1(a) interlocutory appeal taken in response to the suppression of evidence based on a Miranda violation
• applying C.A.R. 26(a) because Crim. P. 37.1(g) directs courts to look to the appellate rules when a procedure is not specifically provided for in Crim. P. 87.1
• applying C.A.R. 26(a) because Crim. P. 37.1(g) directs courts to look to the appellate rules when a procedure is not specifically provided for in Crim. P. 37.1
• involving both the rules of criminal procedure and the rules of appellate 14 procedure
• rules of procedure are interpreted consistently with principles of statutory construction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).