Skip to main content
· 2/14/1984

People v. Zakarian

Citations

  • 460 N.E.2d 422
  • 121 Ill. App. 3d 968
  • 77 Ill. Dec. 366
  • 1984 Ill. App. LEXIS 1497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that at common law, \only tangible personal property could be the subject of larceny. Written documents such as deeds and contracts ... were not considered property for the purpose of larceny.\
  • noting that at common law, “only tangible personal property could be the subject of larceny. Written documents such as deeds and contracts ... were not considered property for the purpose of larceny.”
  • “we find that section 16 — 8, unlawful use of unidentified sound recordings, is an included offense of section 16 — 7(a)(2)”
  • where, at the time a violation of section 16-8 was a Class B misdemeanor, the court noted that persons dealing with counterfeit identified recordings \may be considered more culpable than those *** dealing with unidentified sound recording who do not have similar information at hand\
  • where, at the time a violation of section 16 — 8 was a Class B misdemeanor, the court noted that persons dealing with counterfeit identified recordings “may be considered more culpable than those *** dealing with unidentified sound recording who do not have similar information at hand”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGLOON

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.