People v. Wynne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiff “knew that submission of false invoices was illegal in the sense that he was required by law to file accurate invoices with Customs, and that he intentionally violated the law”
• “It is settled ... that the court possesses the discretion to determine a penalty within the parameters set by the statute.”
• “[T]he statute does not require the court to proceed from a maximum penalty and reduce that amount in the light of mitigating factors....”
• “It is settled ... that the [CJourt possesses the discretion to determine a penalty within the parameters set by the statute.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).