People v. Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• two-witness rule inappropriate in perjury case involving handwriting experts since “oath against oath” rationale that spawned rule does not exist in such a case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Wheel
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1990-11-30· cited 25×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-04-12· cited 15×
• Hourie v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1982-11-09· cited 12×
• State v. Boratto
  New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1977-11-30· cited 8×
• People v. Fellman
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1973-07-23· cited 2×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Weiler v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1945-01-29· cited 290×
• People v. . Doody
  New York Court of Appeals· 1902-10-07· cited 61×
• People v. Nicosia
  New York County Courts· 1937-09-10· cited 11×
• People v. Henry
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1921-04-08· cited 10×
• People v. Phillips
  New York Supreme Court· 1958-06-09· cited 8×
• People ex rel. Madigan v. Sturgis
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1905-12-29· cited 5×
• People v. Quinn
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1930-03-15· cited 5×
• People v. Rosenburg
  New York County Courts· 1952-07-03· cited 4×
• People v. Frost
  New York County Courts· 1953-04-21· cited 4×