· 4/4/1996
People v. Wortham
Citations
- 928 P.2d 771
- 20 Brief Times Rptr. 487
- 1996 Colo. App. LEXIS 97
- 1996 WL 154517
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that language in special sentencing statute that prohibited the court from enlarging the relevant time period was mandatory, and not directory
- concluding that language in special sentencing statute that prohibited the court from enlarging the relevant time period was mandatory, and not directory
- no reversible error in failure to observe time limitations where defendant “ultimately received all benefits” afforded under statute
- no reversible error in failure to observe time limitations where defendant \ultimately received all benefits\ afforded under statute
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marquez, Sternberg, Kapelke
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.