Skip to main content
· 4/4/1996

People v. Wortham

Citations

  • 928 P.2d 771
  • 20 Brief Times Rptr. 487
  • 1996 Colo. App. LEXIS 97
  • 1996 WL 154517

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that language in special sentencing statute that prohibited the court from enlarging the relevant time period was mandatory, and not directory
  • concluding that language in special sentencing statute that prohibited the court from enlarging the relevant time period was mandatory, and not directory
  • no reversible error in failure to observe time limitations where defendant “ultimately received all benefits” afforded under statute
  • no reversible error in failure to observe time limitations where defendant \ultimately received all benefits\ afforded under statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marquez, Sternberg, Kapelke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.