Skip to main content

People v. Woolsey

Citations

  • 564 N.E.2d 764
  • 139 Ill. 2d 157
  • 151 Ill. Dec. 309
  • 1990 Ill. LEXIS 122

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “the State must file a new charging instrument to reinstate its prosecution” (citing Watson, 394 Ill. at 179)
  • cited by the majority, 232 Ill.2d at 340, 328 Ill.Dec. at 272, 904 N.E.2d at 34
  • court should have heard speedy-trial motion before allowing State to nol-pros
  • court should have heard speedy-trial motion before allowing State to nol-pros

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ward

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named People v. Woolsey

10 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.