People v. Woolridge

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant, who pleaded guilty, was sentenced in absentia, and failed to comply with the requirements of Rule 604(d), was limited to the provisions contained in section 115 — 4.1(e
• noting that supreme court rules should be construed together in order to give effect to each rule
• noting that supreme court rules should be construed together in order to give effect to each rule
• noting that supreme court rules should be construed together in order to give effect to each rule
• affirming trial court’s denial of motion to reconsider sentence because motion was untimely
• affirming trial court's denial of motion to reconsider sentence because motion was untimely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).