Skip to main content
· 3/22/2004

People v. Woellhaf

Citations

  • 87 P.3d 142
  • 2003 WL 21403159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deferential abuse of discretion standard discourages an appellate court from second-guessing a trial court's evaluation of a prospective juror's body language and inflection
  • where prospective juror initially expressed doubt as to defendant's innocence, but when questioned indicated \she would try to put her biases aside and would want to listen to the evidence\ (emphasis added
  • in interpreting a statute, a court will not follow construction that defeats legislative intent or leads to an unreasonable or absurd result; a court should endeavor to give effect to each word in a statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Casebolt, Taubman, Nieto

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.