Michigan Court of Appeals· 8/20/2003

People v. Witherspoon

Citations

670 N.W.2d 434
257 Mich. App. 329

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

explaining that “an appellant may not benefit from an alleged error that the appellant contributed to by plan or negligence”
stating that inferences from the evidence presented at trial supported the trial court’s assessment of 15 points for OV 10
affirming finding of predatory conduct when defendant waited until the child victim was alone and assaulted her in the basement
affirming an assessment of 15 points for OV 10 because “the timing of the assault (when no other persons were present) and its location (in the isolation and seclusion of the basement) are evidence of preoffense predatory conduct.”
“An appellant may not benefit from an alleged error that the appellant contributed to by plan or negligence.”
“An appellant may not benefit from an alleged error that the appellant contributed to by plan or negligence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griffin, Gage, Meter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.