People v. Windsor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where there are plausible reasons for a legislative enactment, a court’s inquiry under the rational basis due process test is at an end
• where there are plausible reasons for a legislative enactment, a court's inquiry under the rational basis due process test is at an end

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-07-29· cited 32×
• People v. Gale
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2007-09-07· cited 27×
• People v. Guzman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-12-01· cited 15×
• City of Chicago v. Taylor
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-06-28· cited 12×
• Hunt v. Daley
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1997-02-19· cited 10×
• People v. Warwick
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-09-27· cited 5×
• People v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1994-05-27· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Lindner
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1989-02-22· cited 108×
• People v. Hamm
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1992-06-09· cited 87×
• People v. Haynes
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1991-12-18· cited 6×

Other cases named People v. Windsor

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• People v. Windsor
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1994-10-04· cited 2×
• People v. Windsor
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2024-02-20· cited 1×
• People v. Windsor
  New York Court of Appeals· 2004-03-29
• People v. Windsor
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 2018-10-03