People v. Willis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• New York would not consider a Texas felony conviction for enhancement purposes where Texas would not use the same conviction for enhancement under Texas law
• without reference to Full Faith and Credit Clause, New York court refuses to use for habitual-offender sentencing a Texas offense that, because charge was dismissed, could not be used for such purposes in Texas
• without reference to Full Faith and Credit Clause, New York court refuses to use for habitual-offender sentencing a Texas offense that, because charge was dismissed, could not be used for such purposes in Texas

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Edmondson
  New Mexico Court of Appeals· 1991-09-25· cited 40×
• Stephen Scott Hoffman v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1996-05-15

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ex Parte Murchison
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-01-18· cited 94×
• People v. Turner
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1968-02-15· cited 2×
• People v. Slepinski
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1976-11-05· cited 2×
• People v. Bell
  New York County Courts· 1975-08-20· cited 2×
• People v. Willis
  New York County Courts· 1977-12-23· cited 1×