People v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the facts relevant to the needs of restraint of defendant are not sufficiently developed at trial, a posttrial hearing should be held on that issue
• where the facts relevant to the needs of restraint of defendant are not sufficiently developed at trial, a post-trial hearing should be held on that issue
• where the facts relevant to the needs of restraint of defendant are not sufficiently developed at trial, a posttrial hearing should be held on that issue
• where the facts relevant to the needs of restraint of defendant are not sufficiently developed at trial, a post-trial hearing should be held on that issue
• where the facts relevant to the needs of restraint of defendant are not sufficiently developed at trial, a post-trial hearing should be held on that issue
• where the facts relevant to the needs of restraint of defendant are not sufficiently developed at trial, a post-trial hearing should be held on that issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Johnson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2005-03-24· cited 25×
• People v. Allen
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-12-22· cited 18×
• People v. Neu
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1986-11-20· cited 12×
• People v. Hope
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1979-01-04· cited 5×
• People v. Nelson
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1995-11-15· cited 2×
• People v. Allen Opinion text corrected
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2004-12-22