Skip to main content

People v. Williams

Citations

  • 17 Cal. 142

Syllabus

<p>On trial for murder, a juror, when called for examination, stated that he heard as rumor what purported to be the facts of the case, but did not hear it from a witness, nor from one professing to have knowledge of the facts; and from what he heard, had “formed an opinion as to the guilt or innocence of the accusedthat he had no reason to doubt what he had heard, and believed it at the time, and if the facts turned out the same as he had heard them, his “ opinion was formedHeld, that, upon objection for implied bias, the juror was not disqualified.</p> <p>People v. Reynolds (16 Cal.) cited.</p> <p>On trial for murder—the crime, if any, being committed while defendant was attempting to collect a road tax from a Chinaman—defendant introduced a witness who testified that he had been engaged in collecting taxes in the county, whereupon defendant offered to prove by him that “ it is a notorious fact that Chinese are in the habit of resisting forcibly the collection of taxes, and that all Collectors feel compelled to go armed for the purpose of resisting the assaults of the Chinese; and that it is a common practice for the Chinese to assault Collectors without provocation, and that Collectors have generally to procure others, as a matter of safety, to travel with them while in the discharge of their duties.” Objected to as irrelevant and ruled out: Held, that the evidence was not properly presented, and that there was no error in rejecting it in the form in which it was offered.</p> <p>Held, further, that all the facts explaining the conduct of a party charged with crime should, as a general rule, be admitted in evidence.</p> <p>In cases of homicide, malice, proved by pre-concert, going armed, etc., usually enters into the inquiry. To rebut this or any inference arising from the acts done, defendant may show why he was armed, upon what errand he went, and the like facts.</p> <p>On trial for murder, the Court instructed the jury, that “ The fact that the deceased was a C

Judges: Baldwin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.