Skip to main content

People v. Williams

Citations

  • 942 N.E.2d 1257
  • 239 Ill. 2d 503
  • 347 Ill. Dec. 677
  • 2011 Ill. LEXIS 15

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding \the date a defendant is sentenced and committed to the Department [of Corrections] is to be counted as a day of sentence and not as a day of presentence credit\
  • holding \the date a defendant is sentenced and committed to the Department [of Corrections] is to be counted as a day of sentence and not as a day of presentence credit\
  • holding “the date a defendant is sentenced and committed to the Department [of Corrections] is to be counted as a day of sentence and not as a day of presentence credit”
  • holding \the date a defendant is sentenced and committed to the Department [of Corrections] is to be counted as a day of sentence and not as a day of presentence credit\
  • “date of the mittimus is the first day of sentence and a defendant should therefore not be credited with that day as presentencing credit by the circuit court”
  • “date of the mittimus is the first day of sentence and a defendant should therefore not be credited with that day as presentencing credit by the circuit court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.