Appellate Court of Illinois· 6/4/2009
People v. Williams
Citations
- 910 N.E.2d 627
- 392 Ill. App. 3d 359
- 331 Ill. Dec. 218
- 2009 Ill. App. LEXIS 357
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an affidavit of a participant in a crime who had not been heard from before was newly discovered where the affiant did not provide the affidavit earlier
- finding affidavit of participant in crime who had not been heard from before newly discovered evidence where the defendant argued that affidavit could not have been offered earlier because affiant had not previously agreed to provide an affidavit
- finding affidavit of participant in crime who had not been heard from before newly discovered evidence where the defendant argued that affidavit could not have been offered earlier because affiant had not previously agreed to provide an affidavit
- finding affidavit of participant in crime who had not been heard from before newly discovered evidence where the defendant argued that affidavit could not have been offered earlier because affiant had not previously agreed to provide an affidavit
- in reviewing a trial court’s denial of leave to file a “successive postconviction petition, all well-pleaded facts in the petition and supporting affidavits are taken as true”
- “[A] ruling on an initial postconviction petition has a res judicata effect with respect to claims that were raised or could have been raised in the petition.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court· 2012-04-19· cited 606×
- People v. OrtizIllinois Supreme Court· 2009-11-19· cited 376×
- People v. WhiteAppellate Court of Illinois· 2015-02-06· cited 42×
- People v. AdamsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-10-17· cited 38×
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-12-12· cited 38×
- People v. JonesAppellate Court of Illinois· 2017-12-22· cited 27×
- People v. SimmsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2021-02-09· cited 17×
- People v. EDGESTONAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-11-24· cited 15×
- People v. CarterAppellate Court of Illinois· 2018-07-09· cited 15×
- People v. SimmsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2020-06-03· cited 12×
- People v. SimmsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2021-01-20· cited 1×
- People v. GillespieAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-12-29
- People v. MunozAppellate Court of Illinois· 2010-12-22
Cites
18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court· 1987-05-18· cited 3,807×
- People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court· 1998-10-01· cited 1,609×
- People v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court· 2001-09-20· cited 888×
- People v. PitsonbargerIllinois Supreme Court· 2002-05-23· cited 692×
- People v. FloresIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-11-19· cited 538×
- People v. WashingtonIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-04-18· cited 364×
- People v. RossIllinois Supreme Court· 2008-06-05· cited 356×
- People v. DeltonIllinois Supreme Court· 2008-01-25· cited 280×
- People v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court· 2004-09-23· cited 258×
- People v. TennerIllinois Supreme Court· 2003-03-31· cited 215×
- People v. HarrisIllinois Supreme Court· 2002-06-20· cited 205×
- People v. EnisIllinois Supreme Court· 1994-09-29· cited 124×
- People v. LaPointeAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-06-22· cited 53×
- People v. ArmstrongIllinois Supreme Court· 1973-11-20· cited 44×
- People v. OrtizAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-09-08· cited 25×
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-06-01· cited 17×
- People v. WylesAppellate Court of Illinois· 2008-06-10· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.