People v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where the defendant’s trial counsel was preoccupied with his own indictment in federal court, as indicated in an affidavit, the attorney’s “ ‘psychological state was not conducive to complying with the Illinois Supreme Court Rules regarding Notice of Appeal’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Salem
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2016-03-03· cited 77×
• People v. Frey
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1977-06-01· cited 60×
• People v. Heidelberg
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-11-13· cited 35×
• People v. O'TOOLE
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-09-28· cited 25×
• People v. Harris
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-03-29· cited 24×
• People v. Easley
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-06-27· cited 21×
• People v. Stanford
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-06-16· cited 12×
• People v. Fike
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1987-06-10· cited 10×
• People v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1984-12-28· cited 6×
• People v. Brooks
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-11-10· cited 6×
• People v. K. M.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-04-25· cited 6×
• Local 799, American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Henkhaus
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1980-09-16· cited 5×
• People v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-02-27· cited 2×
• People v. Taylor
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-01-20· cited 1×
• In Re KM
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1979-04-25

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Brown
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1973-03-20· cited 33×
• People v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-11-30· cited 6×