Skip to main content

People v. Williams

Citations

  • 920 N.E.2d 446
  • 235 Ill. 2d 178
  • 93 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1516
  • 336 Ill. Dec. 237
  • 2009 Ill. LEXIS 1935

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that nearly “every, if not every, court nationwide that has considered preemption under section 301 has either expressly or impliedly concluded that preemption was intended to apply to state criminal prosecutions”
  • where the defendant’s discussion of an issue in his brief was so lacking in analysis that it need not be considered
  • “Nearly every, if not every, court nationwide that has considered preemption under § 301 has either expressly or impliedly concluded that preemption was intended to apply to state criminal prosecutions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thomas

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.