Illinois Supreme Court· 11/19/2009
People v. Williams
Citations
- 920 N.E.2d 446
- 235 Ill. 2d 178
- 93 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1516
- 336 Ill. Dec. 237
- 2009 Ill. LEXIS 1935
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that nearly “every, if not every, court nationwide that has considered preemption under section 301 has either expressly or impliedly concluded that preemption was intended to apply to state criminal prosecutions”
- where the defendant’s discussion of an issue in his brief was so lacking in analysis that it need not be considered
- “Nearly every, if not every, court nationwide that has considered preemption under § 301 has either expressly or impliedly concluded that preemption was intended to apply to state criminal prosecutions.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Thomas
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
16 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. GrayIllinois Supreme Court· 2017-09-21· cited 481×
- State Bank of Cherry v. CGB Enterprises, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court· 2013-04-01· cited 101×
- People v. BoeckmannIllinois Supreme Court· 2010-06-24· cited 71×
- People v. MadrigalIllinois Supreme Court· 2011-03-24· cited 71×
- People v. MinnisIllinois Supreme Court· 2017-01-26· cited 66×
- Chicago Board Options Exchange v. International Securities ExchangeAppellate Court of Illinois· 2012-05-25· cited 14×
- Eberhardt v. Village of Tinley ParkAppellate Court of Illinois· 2024-04-24· cited 11×
- People v. GrayIllinois Supreme Court· 2018-03-02· cited 4×
- People v. FarmerAppellate Court of Illinois· 2011-06-01· cited 3×
- C.R. England, Inc. v. The Department of Employment SecurityAppellate Court of Illinois· 2014-05-01· cited 3×
- Burgoyne, LLC v. Chicago Terminal R.R. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois· 2020-06-25· cited 3×
- People v. GriffinAppellate Court of Illinois· 2024-07-09· cited 2×
- People v. LewisAppellate Court of Illinois· 2017-08-02· cited 1×
- State of Tennessee v. Roy Pierson Jr.Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2014-01-23
- People v. DabbsIllinois Supreme Court· 2010-11-18
- State v. OidorCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-12-12
Cites
41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court· 1968-05-27· cited 3,604×
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 2,505×
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 2008-05-19· cited 1,677×
- Murdock v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court· 1943-05-03· cited 1,248×
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court· 1993-04-21· cited 1,080×
- McIntyre v. Ohio Elections CommissionSupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 940×
- Osborne v. OhioSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 897×
- Virginia v. HicksSupreme Court· 2003-06-16· cited 643×
- Compco Corp. v. Day-Brite Lighting, Inc.Supreme Court· 1964-04-20· cited 468×
- Sprietsma v. Mercury MarineSupreme Court· 2002-12-03· cited 377×
- Goldstein v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1973-06-18· cited 302×
- Dowling v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-06-28· cited 268×
- Los Angeles Police Department v. United Reporting Publishing Corp.Supreme Court· 2000-01-12· cited 256×
- People v. WrightIllinois Supreme Court· 2000-10-02· cited 214×
- Wheaton and Donaldson v. Peters and GriggSupreme Court· 1834-03-19· cited 205×
- People v. AdamsIllinois Supreme Court· 1991-10-17· cited 201×
- Busch v. Graphic Color Corp.Illinois Supreme Court· 1996-02-15· cited 200×
- Frank Oddo v. Jack W. Ries, Mme Publications, Mme Publishing Company and Material Movement EnterprisesNinth Circuit· 1984-06-19· cited 134×
- People v. WickIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-07-17· cited 130×
- Baltimore Orioles, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Players Ass'nSeventh Circuit· 1986-10-29· cited 119×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.