People v. Williams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• direct testimony and circumstantial evidence were “amply sufficient” to find that the defendant perpetrated an armed robbery
• direct testimony and circumstantial evidence were “amply sufficient” to find that the defendant perpetrated an armed robbery
• direct testimony and circumstantial evidence were “amply sufficient” to find that the defendant perpetrated an armed robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• People v. Willis
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1973-04-24· cited 17×

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Simmons v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1968-03-18· cited 6,700×
• Stovall v. Denno
  Supreme Court· 1967-06-12· cited 6,066×
• Coleman v. Alabama
  Supreme Court· 1970-06-22· cited 1,808×
• People v. Kern
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1967-03-28· cited 162×
• District of Columbia v. Little
  Supreme Court· 1950-02-20· cited 151×
• People v. Rufus Williams
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1971-12-21· cited 52×
• People v. Panknin
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1966-07-26· cited 48×
• Commonwealth v. Brown
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1970-09-18· cited 14×
• People v. Garcia
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1971-05-20· cited 13×
• People v. McClendon
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1970-01-27· cited 8×
• People v. Sullivan
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1969-06-25· cited 6×
• City of Detroit v. Wilson
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1969-10-29· cited 2×