Skip to main content

People v. Wilhelm

Citations

  • 803 N.E.2d 1032
  • 346 Ill. App. 3d 206
  • 281 Ill. Dec. 411
  • 2004 Ill. App. LEXIS 66

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that where a breathalyzer mouthpiece is replaced following delivery of an insufficient breath sample, the mouthpiece is not a foreign substance invalidating subsequent results
  • stating that “[t]he only issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in its interpretation of the Code”
  • indicating that a “foreign substance” -7- is a substance that “may affect the breath test”
  • indicating that a \foreign substance\ is a substance that \may affect the breath test\
  • the requirement that the suspect may not have had alcohol or any foreign substance in his or her mouth relates to the reliability of the test

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Callum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.