Skip to main content

People v. Whitney

Citations

  • 578 N.W.2d 329
  • 228 Mich. App. 230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussion of written legal opinion at closed meeting is limited to the meaning of strictly legal advice presented in opinion and does not authorize discussion of matters of public policy
  • discussion of written legal opinion at closed meeting is limited to the meaning of strictly legal advice presented in opinion and does not authorize discussion of matters of public policy
  • “[P]roper discussion of a written legal opinion at a closed meeting is, with regard to the attorney-client privilege, limited to the meaning of any strictly legal advice presented in the written opinion.”
  • “[P]roper discussion of a written legal opinion at a closed meeting is, with regard to the attorney-client privilege, limited to the meaning of any strictly legal advice presented in the written opinion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Whitbeck, Fitzgerald, O'Connell, Whit-Beck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.