Skip to main content

People v. Whitfield

Citations

  • 19 Cal. App. 4th 1652
  • 24 Cal. Rptr. 2d 210
  • 93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8284
  • 93 Daily Journal DAR 14058
  • 1993 Cal. App. LEXIS 1106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because amended prostitution offenses “were based on the same conduct as the rapes for which the defendant was being prosecuted, the filing of the information [on rape] tolled the statute of limitations” for the lesser prostitution offenses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Puglia

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.