People v. White

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Thus it appears that the legislature did not intend to introduce a new element into the statutory definition of arson by inserting the phrase ‘without his consent’, and that the statutory plan contemplates that ‘consent’ is an affirmative defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Miller
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-12-02· cited 4×
• People v. Suarez
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1975-11-26· cited 1×
• State of Iowa v. Carmen Ledesma
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2018-10-24
• People ex rel. Lundblade v. Israel
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-09-25

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Harvey
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1973-04-02· cited 181×
• The PEOPLE v. Abrams
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1971-06-24· cited 88×
• People v. Gallo
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1973-06-04· cited 63×
• People v. Billingsley
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1966-02-01· cited 43×
• People v. Williams
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-10-02· cited 43×
• People v. Leach
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1972-01-25· cited 31×
• People Ex Rel. McLain v. Housewright
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-02-13· cited 17×
• People v. Woodward
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1973-09-25· cited 14×
• People v. Harris
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1914-04-23· cited 11×
• People v. Latham
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-07-13· cited 9×
• People v. Gant
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-02-14· cited 8×
• People v. Hoffman
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-02-14· cited 6×
• People v. Abruscato
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1966-11-17· cited 3×