Appellate Court of Illinois· 6/3/2005
People v. White
Citations
- 831 N.E.2d 657
- 357 Ill. App. 3d 1070
- 294 Ill. Dec. 707
- 2005 Ill. App. LEXIS 556
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the trial court had jurisdiction to consider the defendant’s post- conviction motion to correct the mittimus, and reversing the trial court’s denial of the motion
- taking judicial notice of certain Department of Corrections records, as they are public documents
- entertaining an appeal of a denial of a motion for corrected mittimus
- “The purpose of a nunc pro tunc order is to make the present record correspond with what the court actually decided in the past.”
- a trial court retains jurisdiction to correct nonsubstantial matters, such as amendment of the mittimus to reflect additional sentencing credit, after it has otherwise relinquished jurisdiction
- “The purpose of a nunc pro tunc order is to make the present record correspond with what the court actually decided in the past. Such orders may be used to correct clerical errors ***.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lytton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. PetersonAppellate Court of Illinois· 2007-04-18· cited 26×
- People v. GriffinAppellate Court of Illinois· 2017-09-28· cited 20×
- People v. AndrewsAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-06-20· cited 18×
- People v. ColemanAppellate Court of Illinois· 2018-02-16· cited 12×
- People v. MaloneAppellate Court of Illinois· 2023-06-29· cited 8×
- People v. O'NEILLAppellate Court of Illinois· 2006-08-28· cited 7×
- People v. VasquezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2013-07-15· cited 6×
- People v. BrownAppellate Court of Illinois· 2017-04-21· cited 2×
- People v. HeitscholdAppellate Court of Illinois· 2024-04-02· cited 2×
- People v. HollisterAppellate Court of Illinois· 2009-09-23· cited 1×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. FlowersIllinois Supreme Court· 2004-01-26· cited 336×
- People v. RobinsonIllinois Supreme Court· 1996-06-20· cited 274×
- People v. RobersonIllinois Supreme Court· 2004-10-28· cited 77×
- People v. ArnholdIllinois Supreme Court· 1987-01-30· cited 52×
- People v. DuPreeAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-11-16· cited 40×
- People v. WhitmoreAppellate Court of Illinois· 2000-05-04· cited 23×
- People v. ChamberlainAppellate Court of Illinois· 2005-01-21· cited 21×
- People v. HernandezAppellate Court of Illinois· 2004-01-14· cited 20×
- Baker v. Department of CorrectionsIllinois Supreme Court· 1985-04-19· cited 16×
- People v. DennyAppellate Court of Illinois· 1992-12-10· cited 6×
- People ex rel. Lumpkin v. FrantzAppellate Court of Illinois· 1999-07-13· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.