People v. White

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting a similar California statute and concluding that “sexual abuse” doesn’t require a sexual motivation or lewdness because th en it would be redundant to “sexual arousal” and “sexual gratification.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Lovato
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2014-09-11· cited 224×
• People v. Miles
  California Supreme Court· 2020-05-28· cited 102×
• People v. Hecker
  California Court of Appeal· 1990-04-26· cited 64×
• People v. Whitham
  California Court of Appeal· 1995-09-29· cited 55×
• The People v. McCoy
  California Court of Appeal· 2013-05-03· cited 49×
• People v. Young
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-03-16· cited 46×
• People v. Hillhouse
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-06-27· cited 28×
• People v. Shannon T.
  California Court of Appeal· 2006-11-01· cited 15×
• v. Espinosa
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2020-04-09· cited 12×
• People v. Canales
  California Court of Appeal· 2024-07-09
• People v. Canales
  California Court of Appeal· 2024-11-25

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Cicero
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-06-21· cited 91×
• People v. Kusumoto
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-06-20· cited 19×
• People v. Hardin
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-12-15· cited 8×