Skip to main content

People v. White

Citations

  • 842 N.E.2d 188
  • 362 Ill. App. 3d 1056
  • 299 Ill. Dec. 449
  • 2005 Ill. App. LEXIS 1273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defense counsel's cross-examination at trial was to \sacrifice\ defendant for the sake of codefendant, who was acquitted
  • trial counsel’s cross-examination of state witness showed that trial counsel who represented both defendant and codefendant “sacrifice[d]” defendant in favor of codefendant, who was acquitted
  • trial counsel’s cross-examination of state witness showed that trial counsel who represented both defendant and codefendant “sacrifice[d]” defendant in favor of codefendant, who was acquitted
  • actual conflict of interest was shown where attorney represented codefendants tried together and cross-examined a witness to benefit one codefendant at the expense of the other

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Erickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.