People v. Wendy T.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying collateral consequences exception where the “record does not indicate that respondent has ever before been subject to an order for the involuntary administration of medication,” and “[t]hus, there are collateral consequences that might plague respondent in the future”
• applying collateral consequences exception where the “record does not indicate that respondent has ever before been subject to an order for the involuntary administration of medication,” and “[t]hus, there are collateral consequences that might plague respondent in the future”
• upholding a trial court’s finding of a deterioration in the 16 respondent’s ability to function where there was evidence that she was unable to “carry on everyday conversations, accept and process what other people say, make decisions, or execute simple tasks”
• respondent was unable to carry on conversations, carry out even simple tasks, process information, or behave appropriately in court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).