People v. Weaver
Citations
- 147 Cal. App. Supp. 3d 23
- 197 Cal. Rptr. 521
- 1983 Cal. App. LEXIS 2213
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- statute prohibiting, among other things, “sub stantial” obstruction of natural flow of water not unconstitutionally vague
- “Although the reader might visualize a stream as a watercourse through which water flows during all times of the year, the term ‘stream’ is more broadly defined” to include waters that do not flow continuously
- discussing various permissible uses of \substantial\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McMahon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-06-04· cited 49×
- Rutherford v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-01-09· cited 35×
- State v. PetersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-11-15· cited 33×
- People v. BallardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-07-29· cited 22×
- United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.C.D. California· 2016-09-30· cited 11×
- Weaver v. BishopCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1988-12-29· cited 10×
- People v. MurrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-08-20· cited 7×
- People v. Tho Ngoc NguyenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1984-11-07· cited 6×
- Congregation Beth Sholom & Community Center, Inc. v. Building CommissionerMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1989-05-08· cited 2×
- Siskiyou Co. Farm Bureau v. Dept. Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-06-26
Cites
49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 3,306×
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court· 1926-01-04· cited 3,272×
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-24· cited 3,255×
- Parker v. LevySupreme Court· 1974-06-19· cited 1,846×
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court· 1939-03-27· cited 1,416×
- United States Civil Service Commission v. National Ass'n of Letter CarriersSupreme Court· 1973-06-25· cited 1,290×
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1972-06-12· cited 1,156×
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1971-01-19· cited 747×
- Rose v. LockeSupreme Court· 1975-11-17· cited 516×
- People v. DanielsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1969-10-02· cited 510×
- Ivanhoe Irrigation District v. McCrackenSupreme Court· 1958-10-13· cited 234×
- In Re HessCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-10-04· cited 228×
- Bowland v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-12-06· cited 185×
- National Audubon Society v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court· 1983-02-17· cited 176×
- In Re CreglerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1961-07-20· cited 170×
- Archer v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1941-11-14· cited 126×
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court· 1939-06-08· cited 124×
- Bauer v. County of VenturaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1955-10-21· cited 109×
- County of Nevada v. MacMillenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 107×
- People v. BarksdaleCalifornia Supreme Court· 1972-11-22· cited 98×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.