People v. Warnke

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding fact that defendant offered to make restitution to burglary victim was properly admitted as consciousness of guilt
• no jury charge on “unlawful entry” necessary in “burglary” conviction because appellant failed to rebut the Commonwealth’s showing of the requisite intent to commit a felony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).