People v. Wanda B.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding arguments the State forfeited a mootness claim ignored basic principles of law
• reviewing court has a duty to raise issue of mootness sua sponte even if not raised by the parties
• if not raised by the parties, reviewing courts have duty to raise at any time questions affecting court’s authority to hear a given controversy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).