People v. Wagner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court’s grant of prosecution’s motion to reopen after grant of motion to suppress
• appeal is not the exclusive remedy available to the State to challenge a suppression order; the State may move the trial court to reconsider its ruling, relying on Robins and Stokes
• appeal is not the exclusive remedy available to the State to challenge a suppression order; the State may move the trial court to reconsider its ruling, relying on Robins and Stokes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Marker
  Illinois Supreme Court· 2009-04-16· cited 86×
• People v. Williams
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1990-09-19· cited 69×
• State v. Montjoy
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-04-12· cited 40×
• People v. Rimmer
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1985-03-26· cited 31×
• People v. McBride
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1983-04-05· cited 25×
• People v. Marker
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-05-01· cited 14×
• People v. Bryant
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-12-12· cited 12×
• Thompson v. Steptoe
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1988-02-23· cited 11×
• People v. Ramirez
  California Court of Appeal· 1992-06-02· cited 6×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Taylor
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1972-01-27· cited 97×
• People v. Heil
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1978-05-16· cited 54×
• People v. Robins
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-01-22· cited 24×
• People v. Stokes
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-05-13· cited 17×
• People v. Latimore
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1978-12-08· cited 1×