People v. Wages

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the “fact that defendant was 15 years old at the time that he committed the two murders is irrelevant” because “regardless of age, a defendant found guilty of murdering more than one victim must be sentenced to a term of natural life imprisonment ”
• holding that the “fact that defendant was 15 years old at the time that he committed the two murders is irrelevant” because “regardless of age, a defendant found guilty of murdering more than one victim must be sentenced to a term of natural life imprisonment”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).