Skip to main content
· 2/10/1994

People v. Wacker

Citations

  • 629 N.E.2d 764
  • 257 Ill. App. 3d 728
  • 196 Ill. Dec. 219
  • 1994 Ill. App. LEXIS 142

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing, in dicta, that improper imposition of consecutive sentences might violate defendant’s fundamental rights under second prong
  • trial court repeatedly told defendant he would not hold it against him if he did not identify his cocaine suppliers
  • trial court repeatedly told defendant he would not hold it against him if he did not identify his cocaine suppliers
  • trial court repeatedly told defendant he would not hold it against him if he did not identify his cocaine suppliers

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Peccarelli

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.