· 2/10/1994
People v. Wacker
Citations
- 629 N.E.2d 764
- 257 Ill. App. 3d 728
- 196 Ill. Dec. 219
- 1994 Ill. App. LEXIS 142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing, in dicta, that improper imposition of consecutive sentences might violate defendant’s fundamental rights under second prong
- trial court repeatedly told defendant he would not hold it against him if he did not identify his cocaine suppliers
- trial court repeatedly told defendant he would not hold it against him if he did not identify his cocaine suppliers
- trial court repeatedly told defendant he would not hold it against him if he did not identify his cocaine suppliers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peccarelli
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.