People v. Volstad

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the application of the continuing wrong doctrine where the plaintiffs alleged they were induced to purchase unsuitable insurance policies but could not point to a specific wrong that occurred subsequently even though the insurer continued to accept payment of premiums
• “[A]ny wrong accrued at the time of the purchase of the policies, not at the time of payment of each premium.”
• “[A]ny wrong accrued at the time of purchase of the policies, not at the time of 5 payment of each premium[.]”
• “[A] cause of action based on a breach of the implied covenant of good faith cannot be sustained where the plaintiff fails to plead that the defendant ‘injured [his or her] right to receive the benefits of [the] agreement.’” (alterations in original

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).