People v. Vincent
Citations
- 95 Cal. 425
- 30 P. 581
- 1892 Cal. LEXIS 841
Syllabus
<p>Criminal Law — Jury — Challenge to Panel — Second Venire — Challenge to Jurors Resummoned.—The fact that some of the jurors summoned in a criminal case upon a second special venire had also been summoned upon the first special venire, to which a challenge to the entire panel had been sustained by the court, upon the ground of the bias and prejudice of the deputy sheriff who summoned them, furnishes no ground to a challenge of the entire panel of the second venire. Whatever objections might be had to the second panel should be presented as challenges to individual jurors.</p> <p>Id.—Power of Court to Direct Summons of Jurors.—Under section 226 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the court may at any time direct the sheriff to summon jurors from the body of the county, although there be ■ names of properly selected regular jurors in the jury-box; and when from any cause there are no regular jurors to he drawn from, the court may exercise the power granted by said section.</p> <p>Id. — Change of Venue — Discretion. — Although the discretion of the trial court in granting or refusing a change of venue in a criminal action is not an arbitrary discretion, yet where its exercise has not gone beyond legitimate and reasonable limits, it cannot he rightfully interfered with by the appellate court.</p> <p>Id. — Homicide — Drunkenness — Instruction. — Upon a prosecution for murder, an instruction to the jury that evidence of drunkenness can only be considered by them for the purpose of determining the degree of crime, and for such purpose it should be received with great caution, is correct.</p> <p>Id. —Death Penalty — Amendment of Code—Prior Offenses.—The act of the legislature of March 31,1891, amending sections 1217 and 1229 of the Penal Code, relating to the time and place for the execution of the death penalty of one convicted of murder in the first degree, does not apply to convictions for offenses committed prior to its enactment.</p>
Judges: McFarland
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. GorshenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1959-03-11· cited 273×
- People v. DurrantCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-03-03· cited 204×
- People v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court· 1954-03-26· cited 140×
- People v. WhitfieldCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-02-28· cited 80×
- People v. De MossCalifornia Supreme Court· 1935-10-22· cited 76×
- People v. MetheverCalifornia Supreme Court· 1901-03-25· cited 44×
- People v. FellowsCalifornia Supreme Court· 1898-10-05· cited 35×
- Elias v. Territory of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court· 1904-03-26· cited 28×
- People v. SehornCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-04-10· cited 26×
- State v. JukichNevada Supreme Court· 1926-01-12· cited 24×
- State v. RileyUtah Supreme Court· 1911-05-20· cited 23×
- In re DavisIdaho Supreme Court· 1899-12-22· cited 7×
- Stockton Combined Harvester & Agricultural Works v. HouserCalifornia Supreme Court· 1894-07-17· cited 7×
- People v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1951-06-29· cited 5×
- People v. FloresCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1936-06-27· cited 3×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court· 1865-07-01· cited 84×
- People v. McNultyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1892-02-19· cited 63×
- People v. YoakumCalifornia Supreme Court· 1879-07-01· cited 39×
- People v. ElliottCalifornia Supreme Court· 1889-09-02· cited 28×
- People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1883-02-16· cited 24×
- People v. BelenciaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1863-07-01· cited 22×
- People v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1869-01-15· cited 20×
- People v. FerrisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1880-07-01· cited 16×
- People v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court· 1892-01-27· cited 10×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.