People v. Velez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• a law enforcement agency is not entitled to restitution for performing its basic function of investigating and solving crimes
• defendant bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence his entitlement to an exemption from criminal liability for UUW by reason of the weapon at issue being broken down in a nonfunctioning state or not immediately accessible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Kohl
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-04-20· cited 22×
• People v. Fields
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2015-02-10· cited 17×
• People v. Weathersby
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-06-05· cited 15×
• People v. Danenberger
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-05-11· cited 12×
• People v. Williams
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2009-09-15· cited 4×
• People v. Weathersby
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2008-06-04

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Smith
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1999-02-19· cited 602×
• People v. Lamborn
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1999-02-19· cited 81×
• People v. Allen
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1985-11-21· cited 28×
• People v. Halley
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1971-03-11· cited 26×
• People v. Derengoski
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1993-07-29· cited 11×
• People v. Martinez
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1996-12-20· cited 9×
• People v. Otten
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-04-23· cited 4×