People v. Velasquez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant’s car constituted a dangerous weapon because it was “used in a manner to induce the victim’s reasonable belief that the article is a dangerous weapon”
• use of force after taking in an attempt to retain possession of property constitutes force or coercion for armed robbery
• use of force after taking in an attempt to retain possession of property constitutes force or coercion for armed robbery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Morson
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2004-07-30· cited 183×
• People v. Jolly
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1993-06-22· cited 146×
• People v. Norris
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1999-10-08· cited 106×
• People v. Randolph
  Michigan Supreme Court· 2002-07-11· cited 66×
• People v. Daoust
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1998-02-10· cited 39×
• People v. Daoust
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1998-05-05· cited 31×
• People v. Pena
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1997-10-08· cited 24×
• People v. Ortiz
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1997-10-08· cited 6×
• People v. Premen
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-04-21· cited 6×
• People v. Coon
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1993-06-21· cited 5×
• People v. Mehall
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1995-09-12· cited 3×

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• People v. Hampton
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1979-11-26· cited 474×
• Genesee Prosecutor v. Genesee Circuit Judge
  Michigan Supreme Court· 1972-02-25· cited 173×
• People v. Acosta
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1986-07-22· cited 28×
• People v. Daniels
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1988-10-17· cited 27×
• People v. Barkley
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1986-04-22· cited 16×
• People v. Tinsley
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1989-03-21· cited 13×