People v. Veile

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the state’s harmlessness argument, stating “ft]he defendant has a right to know specifically what she is being charged with,” and noting that the evidence was insufficient to support the charged offense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Allison Jenkins v. Keith Nelson
  Seventh Circuit· 1998-10-22· cited 64×
• People v. Jenkins
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1989-10-13· cited 50×
• People v. McBrien
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1986-06-03· cited 34×
• People v. Johnson
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1992-07-10· cited 21×
• In re Raheem M.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2014-01-14· cited 16×
• People v. Satterfield
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1990-04-12· cited 14×
• People v. Moffett
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2020-07-08· cited 10×
• People v. Fuller
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1987-08-28· cited 5×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• The PEOPLE v. Abrams
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1971-06-24· cited 88×
• People v. Brown
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-05-03· cited 18×
• People v. Taylor
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-09-23· cited 17×
• People v. Hale
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1979-10-02· cited 14×
• People v. Claudio
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1973-07-09· cited 11×
• People v. Green
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1977-11-03· cited 5×
• People v. Wright
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1966-09-29· cited 2×