Skip to main content

People v. Vasquez

Citations

  • 84 P.3d 1019
  • 2004 WL 231130

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the substantive restriction of Atkins” does not limit Colorado’s “discretion in allocating and quantifying the appropriate burden of proof”
  • stating that “the substantive restriction of Atkins” does not limit Colorado’s “discretion in allocating and quantifying the appropriate burden of proof”
  • stating that “the substantive restriction of Atkins” does not limit Colorado’s “discretion in allocating and quantifying the appropriate burden of proof”
  • “Atkins placed a ‘substantive restriction on the State’s power to take the life of a mentally retarded offender.’ Atkins, 536 U. S. at 321 (internal quotation marks omitted) (emphasis added
  • “Atkins placed a ‘substantive restriction on the State’s power to take the life of a mentally retarded offender.’ Atkins, 536 U.S. at 321 (internal quotation marks omitted) (emphasis added
  • “Atkins placed a ‘substantive restriction on the State’s power to take the life of a mentally retarded offender.’ Atkins, 536 U.S. at 321 (internal quotation marks omitted) (emphasis added

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kourlis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.