People v. Vasquez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that admission of a police officer’s testimony in which he identified a man in a photograph as the defendant was harmless where the defendant had the opportunity to cross-examine the officer on his testimony
• holding that admission of a police officer’s testimony in which he identified a 26 man in a photograph as the defendant was harmless where the defendant had the opportunity to cross-examine the officer on his testimony
• “Later interrogators are charged with the knowledge of a suspect’s invocation of his right to counsel because of the presumption that the suspect considers himself unable to deal with the pressures of custodial interrogation without legal assistance.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• People v. Frye
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2014-10-23· cited 20×
• People v. Munoz
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2009-08-20· cited 16×
• People v. Jaquez
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2018-05-31· cited 6×
• People v. Coleman
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2018-05-17· cited 1×
• 21SA386- People v. Trujillo-Tucson Orals not held
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 2022-06-21