Skip to main content

People v. Vargas

Citations

  • 949 N.E.2d 238
  • 409 Ill. App. 3d 790
  • 350 Ill. Dec. 750
  • 2011 Ill. App. LEXIS 422

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the “prosecutor’s remarks on rebuttal will not be deemed improper where the record reveals they were the product of defense counsel’s provocation or invitation”
  • remanding for a Krankel inquiry when defendant’s posttrial complaint contained limited detail but “sufficient information upon which further questioning could have resolved any lingering doubt”
  • finding a Krankel inquiry was required where, during allocution, the defendant spoke extensively to the trial court about alleged instances of ineffective assistance of his trial counsel
  • finding it impossible to fully evaluate the defendant’s claims without any inquiry where they “related to matters de hors the - 16 - No. 1-23-2032 record and not readily ascertainable by a trial judge”
  • “prosecutor’s remarks on rebuttal will not be deemed improper where the record reveals they were the product of defense counsel’s provocation or invitation”
  • “we find no error in the trial court’s inquiry and further consideration as to forfeiture or harmless error is unnecessary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Epstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.